AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

DECISION ON ABER CASE RESERVED

11th June 1954, Page 56
11th June 1954
Page 56
Page 56, 11th June 1954 — DECISION ON ABER CASE RESERVED
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

-PLIDGMENT was reserved by the J Transport Arbitration Tribunal last week at the conclusion of the hearing of a compensation claim by Aber Carriers, Ltd., Salop Road, Welshpool.

As reported last week, the British Transport Commission had submitted that a multiplier of 3i was just. Mr. F. W. Beney, Q.C., for the company, said that if ever there were a case for the maximum multiplier to be applied. that of his clients justified it.

It was through the acumen of the company's pioneer, Mr. G. J. Jones. now superintendent of the British Road 'Services Welshpool group, that the business had a "virtual monopoly" in that part of the country.

The president, Mr. R. Montgomery White, Q.C., said that the Tribunal might be able to give their decision on June 21.

B.M.C. OIL ENGINE FOR AUSTIN

A N oil-engincd version of the Austin 2-tonner is now available in this country. The engine used is the B.M.C. 3.4-litre four-cylindered unit, which has a power output of 58 b.h.p. This engine is already fitted to the MorrisCommercial 3-ton oiler, as road tested by The Commercial Motor (May 14), and comparisons between the two vehicles may be made next week, when a full test report of the Austin model will appear in this journal.

a22