1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192 
CASE STUDY
13th April 2006, Page 39
13th April 2006
Page 39
Page 39, 13th April 2006
— CASE STUDY
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
As an independent expert, Gary Poole once helped police search for transport records at a property in northern England. They raided the premises and sent staff to collect records.
They forced a mother, who was scheduled to collect her young child from school, to stay in the office. Laptops and other equipment were bagged and taken away.
The search took almost 24 hours and the case continues. Poole, who now works for TRL, was there to assist a team of detectives more used to interviewing murder suspects than trawling through transport records in an office. "It was a pretty awful experience," he recalls. "Operators think, 'I go to work in a suit and I don't get caught speeding. How can they treat me like that?' But they can."