1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136 
INSURANCE COMPANIES IN DRIVING SEAT
23rd July 2009, Page 10
23rd July 2009
Page 10
Page 10, 23rd July 2009
— INSURANCE COMPANIES IN DRIVING SEAT
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
Periodic training should be driven by insurance companies' desire to reduce the amount they have to pay out because of under-qualified/under-experienced (or just bad) drivers. They know who is filling out their accident forms on a regular basis, who is costing them and the industry money and its reputation.
The only reason we will have the Driver CPC is because a European directive tells us we most, and there is nothing anyone can do to prevent (or change) this.
So what about periodic training for MEPs and chief executives of the Driving Standards Agency?