1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140 
The proof is in the training: better instructors means better drivers
24th June 2010, Page 20
24th June 2010
Page 20
Page 20, 24th June 2010
— The proof is in the training: better instructors means better drivers
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
WITH REFERENCE TO Brian Devis' letter regarding the standard of LGV driving (CM 10 June): 1 believe that the poor standard of driving is partly due to the quality of instruction provided by training schools.
There is still no requirement for all LGV driving instructors to be tested and registered with the Driving Standards Agency (DSA). This allows the less scrupulous training schools to use instructors that have no formal qualifications. If all provisional LGV drivers had to undertake a minimum number of hours training with a DSA registered instructor, the standards would improve. Edward Pargeter
EP Training
Leatherhead, Surrey