1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196 
EGR vs SCR: we need to focus on essentials
27th April 2006, Page 10
27th April 2006
Page 10
Page 10, 27th April 2006
— EGR vs SCR: we need to focus on essentials
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
OAF SALES AND marketing boss Kerry McDonagh warns that the UK truck industry is being distracted from the real issues in the debate raging around EGR vs SCR.
McDonagh says operators should focus on reliability, operating costs and customer service not on whether one technical solution is better than another.
Most operators are more concerned about digital tachographs and the price of fuel than the difference between EGR and SCR."
When it comes to Euro-4, McDonagh believes operators just want a solution that works: "There has been a lot of talk about the potential problems of filling up with AdBlue, but the range is so long it really doesn't matter. We don't get excited about filling up the washer bottleis this any different?"