1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164 
Charles Burke Owner-driver/truck dealer TRS Engineering Rhondda Valley Charles Burke
28th August 2008, Page 28
28th August 2008
Page 28
Page 28, 28th August 2008
— Charles Burke Owner-driver/truck dealer TRS Engineering Rhondda Valley Charles Burke
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
is unequivocal in his condemnation of cameras: "They are a bad thing and don't have a place in road safety," he comments. "There's no doubt that speeding needs to be tackled, but not with cameras. They are nothing more than a money-raising instrument for the government and should be abolished."
Burke sees broader measures that actually help drivers as a better solution. "I believe very firmly that speed limit signs are inadequate. Many people have trouble distinguishing between a 30mph zone and a 40mph zone.
"And signs that measure a vehicle's speed and warn drivers they are exceeding the limit are far and away better than cameras, which just get people's backs up and are very unpopular."