AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

P CORRECTION

2nd September 2010, Page 22
2nd September 2010
Page 22
Page 22, 2nd September 2010 — P CORRECTION
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

PHILLIP ARMSTRONG: In our edition of 4 February 2010, we stated that a Birmingham Employment Tribunal heard evidence that Mr Armstrong was in a pub when he should have been working. In fact, the evidence was to the effect that Mr Armstrong had parked a company vehicle on a main road outside a pub and no mention was made of his being in the pub. We apologise for this error. We also wish to make it clear that claims for unfair dismissal and holiday pay were dismissed upon withdrawal by Mr Armstrong and were not heard by the Employment Tribunal. Instead, the hearing concerned Mr Armstrong's claim for damages for breach of contract, which was dismissed by the Tribunal and his claim for unlawful deduction from wages for which, as we reported, he was awarded £473.70.