1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180 
I v atto (tool In= Engine: 2 5 litre /diesel, 141 hp/330Nm
Page 29
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
Transmissions: 4x2, 4x4;3-spd manual GVWs: 2,800-3,0704 Cabs: single, double Its unfortunate for Mazda that Ford launched the Ranger six months ahead of the Mazda BT50 as the new duo are fundamentally more Mazda than Ford.
Built on the same Thai production line, they share the same running gear, chassis and body sub-structure, including doors, roof and loadbox. but the bulk of their development including the impressive new 2.5-litre common-rail engine is by Mazda. The engine has the flattest torque curve in the sector, giving excellentflexibility and eliminating the need for a six-speed transmission.
The refined engine is adequately matched by extremely well sorted suspension that
manages to give good handling and impeccable ride comfort.
Mazda has a more limited UK range than Ford, with three basic versions, 4x2 and 4x4 single cabs, and a 4x4 double cab, but not the Freestyle extended cab with rear-hinged doors.
The double-cab comes with three trim levels, covering needs from fleet to lifestyle. Even the basic model comes with a reasonably high level of standard equipment.
UKES AND DISLIKES...
v Impressive driveline V Greatly improved refinement
X Limited range X Umbrella handbrake x No ABS on single cabs