1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192 
EMISSIONS: A FAMILIAR STORY
7th September 2006, Page 61
7th September 2006
Page 61
Page 61, 7th September 2006
— EMISSIONS: A FAMILIAR STORY
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
The Super Great and Fighter use EGR as opposed to SCR to meet the Japan 09 emissions protocol.There's a marked divergence of views among the Japanese manufacturers in the great SCR vs EGR debate. lsuzu joins Fuso in the EGR camp; Nissan Diesel backs SCR
This may seem strange, given that Fuse's parent company, DaimlerChrysler has, through Mercedes-Benz, been in the vanguard of promoting SCR in Europe (and, EPA10, in the US) through Freightliner et al.
03Fuso's future within the DC group seems to lie very mu towards the lighter end of the market. Its light-duty technologies are likely to become more prevalent in other DC-brand trucks and, more significantly, it has become the group's HQ of hybrid research