1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172 
Saurer Policy on Diesel Engines.
Page 76
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
In our issue dated June 26th we-dealt with the development of the Snorer Diesel engine as applied to commercial vehicles. We have been asked by the Saurer Commercial Vehicle Co., Ltd., 21, Augustus Street, Albany Street, London, N.W.1, to point out that the details of the description and the results obtained applied, in the main, to the Saucer D,type standard petrol engine converted to the Diesel principle, this conversion being done by the
D22 Saucer works very largely as an experiment for the purpose of acquiring firsthand data. This; of course, is extremely wise and in accordance with tradition in the commercial vehicle industry, where absolute reliability and high efficiency areregarded as essentials.
It is intended to Supply a number of these conversion sets to one or two of the company's customers owning large Beets, so that their standard II)type petrol petrol engines can be utilized as Diesel motors, and the results so
obtained will certainly prove very interesting both to themselves and to the maker. It is not, however, intended to adopt this procedure universally, but merely as a prelude to the introduction of the six-cylindered Diesel engine proper; of which we also gave preliminary details.
In one portion of our article we referred to the compression pressure as being 32 atmospheres, or. 47 lb. .This was obviously a. typographical error and should have read 470 lb.