AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

THE CASE FOR THE SAFETY NOSE

11th October 2012, Page 30
11th October 2012
Page 30
Page 30, 11th October 2012 — THE CASE FOR THE SAFETY NOSE
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Long-time long-nose lorry advocate Scania added a new twist to the story in 2003 when it proposed adding a 600mm “deformable crash-zone” to a cab-over tractor, claiming it could save up to 900 lives a year on European roads. The safety-nose, consisting of a collapsible honeycomb structure and energy-absorbing frame, would raise the survivable collision speed in a head-on crash between a truck and a passenger car from 56km/h to 90 km/h. Not surprisingly, EU length laws scuppered the idea, though Scania insisted: “Changing the legislation to permit extra length and weight for trucks with a crashzone would encourage truck operators to invest in increased protection for other road users.”