Sonia backs EGR for Euro-4
Page 12

If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
Scania has come out fighting on Euro-4, with its money still on exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) as the more reliable technology. Andy Salter reports.
SCANIA HAS blasted back in the battle for technical superiority ahead of the Euro-4 emissions deadline in 2006.
The Swedish truck and engine builder will meet the new law with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) on its 9,11 and 12-litre engines, claiming that EGR will be just as, if not more, efficient than the rival selec tive catalytic reduction (SCR). Congestion To date SCR, set to be offered by Mercedes, Iveco, Volvo and Dathad widely been thought of as the superior technology with the alternative exhaust gas recircula tion (EGR) regarded as low-tech.
"A lot of the competitors are claiming fuel efficiency improvements with their SCR technology over EGR," says Hasse Johansson, head of research and development at Scania. "That may be so, but in terms of operational costs there are many unknown factors which will impact on the costs to users.
"I think people need to be careful with some of the public claims which are being made. We don't know yet whether the urea infrastructure will be fully in place The cost of the liquid is unclear and there is a question mark over the in-service reliability of SCR in a range of operating conditions."
Scania has joined MAN in offering EGR, though it will opt for SCR on its V8 motor."This is due to cooling constraints," says Urban Johansson, head of Scania's powertrain division.
"It does, however, mean we have a lot of experience with SCR and surely the fact that we have opted for EGR given this experience tells you something about the relative merits of the two solutions," he adds.
• For more on Euro-4 engine technology, see page 58.