1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190 
To borrow some advertising guff from a well known exterior
Page 45
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
coating supplier, the Kerax does exactly what it says on the tin. This truck has no pretensions of grandeur, there's no unnecessary luxury for the driver and ride comfort leaves a lot to be desired. But for all that it's a truck we soon came to like.
The engine is gutsy, the cab's compact and the manoeuvrability, even in tight spots, is better than expected.
We can only take its off-road credentials on trust, but if looks are any measure of ability it should be a capable performer.
We've tried not to focus on fuel economy too much on this test this isn't a sector where efficiency is a high priority. No matter whi sector you compete in you can't ignore fuel costs.
But ,while the 5,46mpg overall economy of the Kerax appears be worryingly low, when its payload is taken into account the payload productivity analysis doesn't appear quite so eye-watering.