1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194 
THE VERDICT The consequences of losing a trailer could be
27th January 2005, Page 59
27th January 2005
Page 59
Page 59, 27th January 2005
— THE VERDICT The consequences of losing a trailer could be
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
nightmarish and SKS/KKS offers correct coupling compared with a conventional fifth wheel. It's not cheap and there's no slider or pressed steel version... yet. But you could end up with some very happy drivers, particularly those who've previously struggled on dark, rainy nights wilding up landing legs and struggling with recalcitrant locking handles.
The full KKStractorftrailer rig is clearly the best approach, but wary operators can test the water with SKS. Even without auto landing legs, you'd still get auto-coupling and sensing so iswapability' between a KKS tractor and a 'normal' trailer is OK.
But why settle for half-measures?