AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

letters

2nd July 1998, Page 25
2nd July 1998
Page 25
Page 25, 2nd July 1998 — letters
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Do you want to comment on any of the stories in Commercial ? Does someone in the industry deserve a pat on the back—or a public dressing down? Or is there simply something you want to say to our readers? Don't keep it to yourself —drop us a line at CM Letters, Rm H203, Quadrant House, The Quadrant, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5A5. Alternatively, you can fax your letter to us on 0181 652 8971 or e-mal it to Miles.Brignall@rtico.u1' Letters may be edited for length and do not necessarily represent the views of the editor.

Absolute injustice

hilip Parker of Transport 2000 (Sound off, CM18-24 June), states that road freight effectively receives hidden subsidies as taxes paid do not cover the costs of road maintenance, accidents and pollution.

Please can he publish the absolute figures of taxes paid by hauliers and the absolute costs, because I am bored with this statement being made so often with no numbers to back it up. Those of us in the haulage industry find it unjust that a huge portion of our revenue goes to the Government in tax. There are few other industries, apart from those in the leisure market such as alcoholic drinks and tobacco, that are as heavily taxed for doing an honest day's work.

To suggest the taxes levied from smaller haulage companies should be recycled to provide lower rates and taxes for other businesses is at the very least offensive. It is time some of the academics did a week's hard graft within a small haulage company before dreaming up such ideas.

John Allsop, Edward Allsop, Mill Hill, Leicester.