1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164 
Julian Milnes
Page 43
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If the SsangYong is a snip, it also can't equal the Freelander for onor off-road ability. That doesn't mean the Kyron is particularly poor In fact, we were surprised with what you got for the price.
From the outside, We striking enough, while the inside is suitably comfortable for long journeys and harsh conditions.
It's also easy to drive, and offers enough engine and chassis performance to cope well enough when called upon.
But you wouldn't necessarily want to abuse it either which is where the Freelander comes in.
We thought this may be an entry-level 'Chelsea Tractor', ideal for those who want to pose but not go off-road we were wrong. Such is its ability on the rough stuff, you feet you could enter some pretty hairy moments and come through with performance to spare it's exceptionally mobile and capable on many terrains.
If we had to make a choice, wed go for the Land Rover; it may be the obvious decision, but it's also the more effective business machine when all things are considered.