1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164 
0-tic lack costs 18
5th November 1971, Page 36
5th November 1971
Page 36
Page 36, 5th November 1971
— 0-tic lack costs 18
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• Mr James Polesworth, a mobile greengrocer of Leeds Road. Bradford, was fined £8 and ordered to pay £1.20 witness costs at Bradford magistrates' court last week when he admitted operating a vehicle without an 0 licence. He was given 28 days to pay.
Mr Raymond E. Thomas, a DoE vehicle examiner, said that following inquiries it was found that the vehicle, which had an unladen weight of 2 tons was not covered by an operator's licence. As a result of this Mr Polesworth was interviewed on July 28 1971 and told the vehicle examiner that the vehicle which was on hire did not, so far as he knew, need a 0 licence and that he intended to dispose of it in any case as soon as the excise licence expired.