AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Coal convoy firm gets discharge

7th December 1985
Page 15
Page 15, 7th December 1985 — Coal convoy firm gets discharge
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

A SOUTII YOl).KSlllIth hatifier has been Cound guilty of permitting seven I its drivers to take insufficient rest and to exceed duty time during the miners' strike, hot the company and drivers have been given 12-month conditional discharges.

The company, G. C. and I). Gill (Transport) Ltd, and the drivers appeared before 1)oncaster niagistrates (CM, November 3) I).

David Gill, a director, said it had been a very difficult period. The company had a system of making mainly visual random checks on tachograph charts, and when discrepencies were spotted the company was given what it regarded as reasonable explanations by the drivers_ In most cases, the police instructed drivers what to do. They were being held up in convoys.

In reply to Michael Broome, prosecuting for the North-Eastern 'Iraffic Area, Gill did not recall being told by a traffic examiner in July P/84 that the company's drivers were not taking sufficient rest breaks.

The drivers. Paul Chapman of Hiorne; George Cox of Rawmarsli; Edward Wright of Skellow; Edward Baker of Arksey: Stephen Shuffiehottom of Woodlands; Graham Bull of Town Moor and Bernard Moore of Candy were

each ordered to pay towards the cost of the prosecution and the company was ordered to pay ti _1.51).