1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190 
Deferred decision on 'borrowed' licence
Page 33
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
A WEST MIDLANDS tyre company which mistakenly thought it could use someone else's 0-licence has to wait to see if its own licence bid will succeed.
The West Midland Deputy Commissioner, Alan Bourlet, was considering taking action against the licence held by Malvern-based Selas, trading asThree Counties industrial Tyres, together with a bid for a fresh restricted licence for three vehicles by Summit Tyres (UK), of Coventry PC Anthony Parker, of Warwickshire Police, said a vehicle displaying a Selas licence disc was stopped in January. The driver, who was not keeping a tachograph record, said the vehicle was operated by Summit Tyres. The company was asked for three months tachograph charts and 18 were produced. A number had no centre field entries and others had been left in the tachograph for more than 24 hours. The company was fined £1,200, with £30 costs, for using a vehicle without an 0-licence and for failing to issue a driver with sufficient tachograph records.
Christopher Wilson, Summit's industrial sales manager and former director of Selas, said Selas ceased trading in 2002. He joined Summit in April 2003.That company acquired a vehicle soon after and he applied for a licence disc as Selas, writing on Selas headed notepaper.
He said he had not understood that two companies were separate entities requiring separate 0-licences. The DTC will announce his decision in writing at a future date.