AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Hunt's gains by council talks

13th June 1996, Page 13
13th June 1996
Page 13
Page 13, 13th June 1996 — Hunt's gains by council talks
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Surrey County Council says hauliers who want to alter operating centres should talk to it first to forestall potential problems.

Council transportation planning officer Pauline Knowles says: "It is nearly always better for us to talk to operators if they are thinking of switching operating centres or opening new ones. We can either tell them that we have no objection or, if we do, work out a compromise. Either way the costly public inquiry process can be avoided."

Surrey's call to hauliers is underlined by a recent case involving Hunt's of Ottershaw, which faced potential problems over renewal of its 0-licence (CM 9-15 Nov 1995).

After talks with SCC a compromise was agreed, the council withdrew its objection and both WS Hunt's Oil and WS Hunt's Transport have now had their licences renewed.

Commercial director Malcolm Hunt says: "It transpired that the council's objections applied largely to the considerable flexibility of options in the outline licence, but it was happy to compromise on allowing the existing licence to continue.

"We were particularly pleased that the council saw our point of view," he adds. "The compromise saved both parties and the taxpayer significant time and money."