. . . but they must specify trailers
Page 57
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
The action Mr. Hanlon took in regard A. Sanderson (Great Broughton), Ltd., " delicensing " the two articulated hides (they were, in fact, York ombones) the company operated, plus itricting the remaining six trailers to a iximum of 35 ft. overall in length (see ge 555 of this week's The Commercial otor) was because, in the eyes of Mr. tnlon, Sanderson's had misled potential jectors and thus committed a fraud on road haulage industry and also on the blic.
Me history of the matter is rather nplicated, It came to light, apparently, a result of an application by Sander
fs in 1961 to renew their A mce in respect of eight artics and one Id vehicle. In that application was a pest to add a vehicle to be acquired." Dbjections were received by the L.A.
m Siddle C. Cook, Ltd., Sunter 3thers, Ltd., and A. Stevens and Co. lulage), Ltd. Another local operator opley Haulage Co.—also entered an iection.
n a letter to the objectors Sanderson's damned that the additional vehicle, ich would be of normal length, would