1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144 
SHOULD BUS COMPANIES PAY FOR TOILETS?
19th November 1965, Page 31
19th November 1965
Page 31
Page 31, 19th November 1965
— SHOULD BUS COMPANIES PAY FOR TOILETS?
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
" HAVE the bus and oil companies been the
on the subject of
meeting the cost of providing roadside toilets in return for facilities for advertising therein'?" asked Mr. Clive Bossom, MP, on Monday. The occasion was a conference on the subject of sanitary facilities on British roadS, sponsored by Spring Grove Laundries 1.td. Mr. Bossom's question went unanswered. Perhaps a more practical solution for dealing with this costly. but very necessary, facility was the suggestion made by Mr. Christopher Chataway, MP, that a charge of. say, bd. or Is. should be made for the use of property designed and equipped conveniences with all necessary facilities. After all, 6d. was not much. to charge today for proper facilities of this nature, he said.