1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136 
oubts on ontainer tandards
Page 19
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
)UBTS about the Health d Safety Executive plans for specting containers have en expressed by the Freight ansport Association.
While it has accepted the leme in principle, it has ught an assurance that HSE 11 not demand the disposal of ler types of container. The 'A says it knows of no idence to suggest that older ntainers are dangerous.
'It would be disastrous if iny existing containers were ailed because of the detailed )roval requirements," says A.
['he FTA asks that it be tde clear with whom res-' nsibility for container .ndards lies, because they inge hands so often as to ke it impossible for a road hide operator to know :ether or not it complies :h regulations.
t asks also that more infortion be given on the legal sition of demountable lies and builders' skips, and pes that there will not be overlap between the HSE ;ulations and those of the partment of Transport.