1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194 
trial for everyone
3rd February 2005, Page 26
3rd February 2005
Page 26
Page 26, 3rd February 2005
— trial for everyone
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
1-IE ANSWER TO the M42 ingle-lane problem lies with car rivers, so spare a thought for hem as they approach the exit at unction 11.
Our lorries can only travel at the peed of the slowest vehicle in ront; therefore we must be iumper-to-bumper, almost trainIke, as we pass the slip road. This is a terrible situation for the at drivers as, with no possibility of ;etting into the nearside lane, they lave to drive to the next junction n order to get off the motorway. The only thing I can suggest s that these drivers complain to he Highways Agency to get this rial ended.
Reve Martin