1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174 
UNREASONABLE PROTECTIVE FARE ALLEGED.
8th February 1935, Page 128
8th February 1935
Page 128
Page 128, 8th February 1935
— UNREASONABLE PROTECTIVE FARE ALLEGED.
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
THE protection afforded to Bradford Corporation in the fixing of fares on bus services was discussed during the hearing of an appeal in Leeds, on Monday. Mr. Samuel Ledgard, of Leeds, appealed against the fare fixed by the Yorkshire Traffie Commissioners in respect of part of two of his routes, which, it was argued, was not equitable and was higher than that charged by other private operators running into Bradford, The corporation denied that the protection given by Mr. Ledgard was inequitable. Because of differing conditions the necessity of protection varied, and the appellant's comparison with the protection given on other routes was said to be wholly misleading.. I Leeds Corporation also opposed the appeal.